The Criminal Division of the Supreme Court analyses in its Ruling 132/2021 of 15 February the appropriateness of applying the aggravating circumstance of abuse of trust or personal relationships in the crime of fraud.
The Supreme Court considers it necessary to restrict its use insofar as an additional element is required to understand that the abuse of trust that necessarily accompanies all deception in a fraud goes beyond what is usual in the crime of fraud.
In most cases, there is a personal relationship between the perpetrator of the fraud and the victim, and therefore an abuse of trust that is already included in the definition of the offense, so that convicting with the aggravating circumstance produces bis idem, which means condemning twice for the same abuse of trust that is already included in the type of fraud.
For the aggravating circumstance to be applied, the Supreme Court requires that the relationship between the fraudster and the victim be different from that which derives from the same deceitful relationship. The breach of trust inherent to the deceptive conduct must refer to a trust before and separate from the one that takes place as a presupposition of the commission of the fraud. In other words, there must be a breach of trust before the breach of trust is deemed necessary to carry out the scam.
This means that, for the courts to consider the aggravating circumstance, there must be a prior personal relationship between the fraudster and the defrauded, which gives the abuse a greater dimension and, consequently, a greater criminal reproach.
The betrayed trust must have existed before the betrayal. Suppose the trust is contemporary to the deception insofar as it is established to deceive to achieve a financial benefit. In that case, it does not constitute an aggravated fraud.
If you need a criminal lawyer in Barcelona who specializes in resolving any problem related to the crime of fraud, don’t hesitate to contact us.